Connect with us

Pitt Football

Pitt Drops Sun Bowl to Stanford; Finishes 7-7

Published

on

Pitt dominated Stanford through three quarters in the 2018 Sun Bowl in El Paso, Texas on Monday, but the Cardinal came through when it counted, scoring the lone touchdown of the fourth quarter on a lucky bounce to beat Pitt, 14-13.

Stanford K.J. Costello was sacked by a Pitt defensive end on the Panthers’ 2-yard line and stripped of the ball, but Costello fumbled forward into the end zone, where it was recovered by Stanford running back Cameron Scarlett for the game-winning score.

Pitt had two more chances to re-gain the lead. Alex Kessman missed a 55-yard field goal on the first opportunity. Pitt was stopped when Kenny Pickett’s pass attempt to Taysir Mack was off the mark on the fourth down on the final drive.

Pickett passed for 136 yards, more than in either of his last two games, but was an inefficient 11 of 29 and missed many open receivers throughout the game.

Pitt’s rushing game was paced by Darrin Hall, who had 123 yards and a touchdown on 16 carries. Qadree Ollison was lost to an ankle injury in the first quarter, and A.J. Davis filled in with 26 yards on six carries.

Pitt opened the scoring with a 29-yard field goal by Kessman at 14:14 of the second quarter after a long Hall run got Pitt inside the red zone.

Stanford answered with a 1-yard plunge for a score by Scarlett later in the second quarter, but Hall scored on a six-yard carry before the half to send the Panthers into the break up, 10-7.

Kessman added a second field goal late in the third quarter to give Pitt at 13-7 lead. Pitt had three drives go into the red zone, and had two short field goals and a touchdown.

The Panthers also had five drives stall between the Stanford 42 and the Stanford 37. They attempted just one field goal on those drives.

Pitt finishes its 2018 season at 7-7, a two-game improvement from 2017. The Panthers have lost four consecutive bowl games, dating back to the 2013 Little Ceasars Pizza Bowl.

Sandy Schall, Coldwell Banker
4 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sean
Sean
5 years ago

Dominated is a bad choice of word to describe Pitt’s play early against Stanford in this, once again, lackluster performance in a bowl game. Such a disappointment. Why would kids want to play for a mediocre team? Here comes a slew of transfers….

Pat adonizio
Pat adonizio
5 years ago

Clearly the difference was QB play from and individual basis, and coaching adjustments at half. The QB issue is due to failure to develop talent and lack of depth which has it’s beginnings in Nardi’s 1st season by bringing-in a transfer in Peterman when clearly none was needed, resulting in a stream of qb’s leaving and more transfers-in and continues. If you look at our team the past several years QB ineffectiveness is bottomline and it’s lack of commitment to your kids and failure to develop them. Instead of staying with the kids we had and bringing them along we… Read more »

Bob Cardy
5 years ago
Reply to  Pat adonizio

Pat, Peterman is clearly the best QB Pitt has had since Rod Rutherford. That transfer was a win. The rest were loses and we may have let a decent QB get away in McVittie. I don’t blame the lack of production on Pickett, it lays squarely at the feet of his QB coach and offensive coordinator. Watson is predicable and his offense is outdated. You can still be RBU and be creative. Watson lead to the firing of his coach at Texas, can’t remember his name at the moment, He will be Naduzzi’s downfall if he is not removed now.… Read more »

Richard Johnson
Richard Johnson
5 years ago
Reply to  Bob Cardy

Charlie Strong.

 
Like Pittsburgh Sports Now on Facebook!
Send this to a friend