Connect with us


Op-Ed: Letter to Pitt Athletics from Former Athletes



Pitt/Cathedral of Learning

Editor’s Note: This letter has been published unaltered from its source. The identities of its signatories have been confirmed.

The University of Pittsburgh, through an athletics department spokesperson, provided a response.

To the University of Pittsburgh Athletic Dept. & Administration, With Intention for All Institutions of Higher Learning

By: Jordan Fields & Ian Troost, former student-athletes at the University of Pittsburgh

June 8th, 2020

We write this as alumni with a complicated love for the University of Pittsburgh. We find it difficult to differentiate between our pride in our historically groundbreaking institution, versus our frustration because we know Pitt is not currently doing enough to listen to, uplift, and support its Black students and student-athletes.

While you recently made [delayed] statements (nine days after four police officers murdered George Floyd), we want you to know your overall silence on the institutionalized nature of police brutality and racism has been deafening to your alumni, faculty & staff, fans, students, and student-athletes.

Your retweets of Nike advertisements, acknowledgement of pain, and statements of support during the past week, all of which are reflective of the stance that Black Lives Matter, are appreciated. However, they appear performative, as they are lacking a course of action to make the University a safer institution for its Black students and student-athletes.

Ian Troost-

As I reflect on my time as a University of Pittsburgh Football Player, and my peaceful protest during the National Anthem in 2017, I can’t help but think about how your silence goes much farther back than the past week. I think about how multiple Black teammates of mine were dissuaded from peacefully protesting in 2017. Additionally, I clearly recall the backlash from specific Athletic Administrators who told me, “You’re just a 20 year-old that doesn’t know what you’re talking about”, as well as that I was being selfish and attention-seeking. Most importantly, these Administrators politicized the protest, and implied that the lost revenue for the University, whether from donors or season ticket holders, was more important than taking a public stance on the fact that Black Lives Matter. 

While the Administration made mistakes, I feel there is tremendous opportunity for growth at hand. As an ally, it is my duty to amplify the voices of my Black peers. In order for effective growth to take place, I recommend you listen to the thoughts and experiences of your Black student-athletes, starting with former Track & Field athlete, Jordan Fields.

Jordan Fields-

As a university alumnus and former student-athlete, I am gravely disappointed that it has taken this long for the University of Pittsburgh’s Athletic Department to address the murders of Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor, and George Floyd.

Black student athletes at the University of Pittsburgh have historically shown a deep commitment to their sport and University, only to have a fraction of that commitment returned in support from the campus community.

In this moment of truth, there is an opportunity for the past to be prologue for significant improvements to the experiences of current Black student athletes. In order for that to happen, the following structures and opportunities are essential:

1.    A formal committee, composed of Black student-athletes, athletes of color, and allies from each team to ensure that the breadth and depth of Black student-athletes’ concerns are met, and that our standards are continuously upheld. This committee must consist of a combination of athletes, ranging from every year of education, to those that do not receive much playing time or exposure, to starters and captains. This will ensure that the diversity of experiences of student-athletes are heard. In order to effectively do that work, the committee must meet twice a semester with Athletics administrators, the Dean of Students, Office of Diversity and Inclusion, the Faculty Athletics Representative, and any other parties deemed necessary or appropriate. This Committee should be in place no later than October 1, 2020.

 2.    Mandatory anti-racism/anti-bias training and the development of anti-racism affinity groups. Training must be mandatory for staff AND student athletes to work towards developing a more culturally competent department.

3.     While the addition of mental health counselors has helped the department and student-athletes, to better support the unique needs of the Black student-athlete population, the Department must hire a Black mental health counselor, as soon as possible.

4.    A specific administrator, or committee, tasked with receiving whistleblower complaints related to bias, in order hold coaches, faculty, and other student athletes accountable for their actions without fear of retaliation against them for facilitating those complaints. This individual/committee must conduct an annual report on the effectiveness of anti-bias training within the day to day life of the Department, and must not report within the Department’s reporting structure.

 5    The reinstatement of collaborative events with the African American Alumni Council (AAAC) and other community groups to celebrate the legacies of Black Pitt athletes. In 2011, the Department hosted Athletics at Pitt: A Century at the Forefront of Change” in collaboration with the AAAC to commemorate the accomplishments of Black Pitt athletes since 1911. We believe that holding an annual event to commemorate and celebrate the successes of Black Pitt athletes, both in competition and in life after athletics would celebrate their legacies and catalyze the power of possibility for both Pitt’s Black student athletes, and young Black people in the broader Pittsburgh community.

6.    The severing of all ties with any boosters and donors who are known to exhibit racist behavior via social media, or otherwise, as the University of Southern California has done.

Pitt Athletics has stood on the front lines of social justice before, notably when Panther tailback Bobby Grier integrated the Sugar Bowl in a racially charged era and location by participating with the Panthers in the 1956 edition of the game. Minimizing the contributions of men and women the likes of business leader Herb Douglas, the oldest living African American Olympic medalist, two-time Olympic champion Roger Kingdom, NFL and College Football Hall of Famers like Curtis Martin, Hugh Green and Tony Dorsett, the late Lorri Johnson and countless others only furthers our pain. We cannot let those legacies be diminished.

Our Department’s core values, or bridges, explicitly talk about how we connect our past with our present and future to Unite and Engage, and that we lead with Integrity Always. Pitt student-athletes define the “Gold Standard ” as the expectation to achieve at the highest level, relying on Respect, Accountability, Trust, Teamwork and Leadership to underpin it.

As Forever Panthers, we feel it is our duty to speak up in support of current student-athletes, and encourage the Department to hold itself accountable. It’s time to take a public stand against racism and systemic injustice, and return to our position as leaders in the effort to dismantle racism in college athletics. Starting today, let’s be the “Gold Standard” for Collegiate Athletics across the country. Hail to Pitt.


Jordan Fields, Track & Field, Class of 2020

Ian Troost, Football, Class of 2018

Sandy Schall, Coldwell Banker
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Zach Marsili
3 years ago

Good for them! Very well thought out and articulated thoughts. I like how they address past criticisms of the university and then proposed some ideas for future change. Many of their solutions seem to be attainable. I hope Heather Lyke is listening. It would be a shame if she dismisses these comments because they come from nonrevenue athletes

Todd Simpson
Todd Simpson
3 years ago

I agree with most of this request by alumni.

However, the demand to cut ties with anyone who has made a racial remark is a flawed request. What constitutes a racial remark differs amoung people. For example, if I were to say “ all lives matter”, some people call me a racist. If I were to publicly disagree with throwing rocks at cops, some people call me a racist. If I simply say a support police, people call me a racist.

3 years ago
Reply to  Todd Simpson

If you honestly believe that, maybe you need to educate yourself. Saying “all lives matter” comes from misunderstanding “black lives matter.” Its not a disregard of the lives of Caucasians, asian or any other life. Its simply a message that black lives matter too in response to senseless killing of black men from police brutality. Not sure anyone would be angry with speaking out against violence against police as long as you are as fervent against violence against citizens, which you seem to be based on you’re initial response.

3 years ago

Troost was the backup punter who took a knee. All of us are or should be shocked by the Floyd murder but before you WOKE younsters go all crazy about as Black Lives Matter cries “genocide” and ask for whites to kneel and apologize to them consider this. We fought in the 50’s and 60’s to stop the bow to white supremist police in the South eg Bull Conner. That was racist; it then it is racist now when demanded by BLM. Sickening racist bullying. Further “genocide”? , hey you WOKE youngsters last year according to the Washington Post there… Read more »

Like Pittsburgh Sports Now on Facebook!
Send this to a friend