247Sports Ranks Nate Yarnell as Worst ACC Starting QB

It’s safe to say that the national media will not favor Pitt favorably ahead of the season, including new starter Nate Yarnell.

Yarnell was ranked as the 17th-best quarterback in the ACC following the spring season, which ranks 17th out of 17th by 247Sports’ Brad Crawford.

Crawford wrote that Yarnell “survived” the entire spring as the Pitt starting quarterback, which he did. But he didn’t offer any rationale for the decision. It likely comes down to Yarnell’s inexperience in college football.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by CBS Sports College Football (@cbssportscfb)

All five scholarship quarterbacks received reps in the spring game at Acrisure Stadium last month, but only Yarnell and Eli Holstein recorded double-digit passing attempts. Holstein will continue to push Yarnell, but Pat Narduzzi confirmed that Yarnell has earned that QB1 moniker.

“Yes, he will be (starting quarterback entering summer camp),” Narduzzi said following the scrimmage.

Yarnell was efficient — and effective — in just over a half of action, completing 12-of-16 pass attempts for 108 yards and a touchdown. His 34-yard touchdown strike to Lamar Seymore in the third quarterback, his only drive of the quarter, was a highlight.

It was probably the highlight of offensive play Saturday.

Yarnell put together a consistent spring. He’s emerged as a leader in the locker room, voted as the best teammate by his peers, and his play on the field Saturday only reinforced his standing amongst his peers. It’s remarkable to Narduzzi that this is the first season that Yarnell is receiving first-team reps.

“This is the first opportunity he’s had since he’s been here to get reps with the ones, and to me, that’s the most impressive thing,” Narduzzi said. “He just keeps learning. He’ll have this offense mastered by the end of summer camp.”

Yarnell — a 6-foot-6, 215-pound redshirt junior from Austin, Tx. — started two games last season. And in those two starts, against Boston College and Duke, he completed 36-of-54 pass attempts (66.7%) for 472 yards with four touchdowns (one rushing) and one interception.

Kade Bell sees potential and feels like he knows what to do to put Yarnell in the best position to succeed.

“To me, the reason we’re putting everything on Nate and putting everything on the quarterbacks is because, by the first game, I’m going to know what Nate’s good at,” Bell said in March. “With all the tips he’s had already in the first half of the spring, shoot, I’m gonna know who Nate is as a quarterback and I’m going to know what his strengths are, what his weaknesses are and then it’s my job after fall camp — Hey, this is what Nate does well, let’s put him in a position to be successful.”

Bell prides himself on his ability to scheme wide receivers open. Yarnell will have an opportunity to succeed if he can put his trust in Bell and continue to reach for the standard that Bell demands from his quarterbacks. He connected on 75% of his balls and hit his deep shot in live action Saturday. And there’s a lot of room for improvement.

“Coach Bell is asking a lot of me and that’s exactly what I want,” Yarnell said. “He’s expecting me to be able to process exactly what he wants, the way he wants it and we’re gonna get it done.”

Yarnell isn’t the best quarterback in the ACC, but if he’s able to build off of what he did to end last season, he certainly won’t be the worst either.

Full list:

1. Cam Ward (Miami)
2. DJ Uiagalelei (Florida State)
3. Grayson McCall (North Carolina State)
4. Haynes King (Georgia Tech)
5. Kyron Drones (Virginia Tech)
6. Preston Stone (SMU)
7. Cade Klubnik (Clemson)
8. Tyler Shough (Louisville)
9. Kyle McCord (Syracuse)
10. Thomas Castellanos (Boston College)
11. Max Johnson (North Carolina)
12. Fernando Mendoza (Cal)
13. Maalik Murphy (Duke)
14. Anthony Colandrea (Virginia)
15. Ashton Daniels (Stanford)
16. Hank Bachmeier (Wake Forest)
17. Nate Yarnell (Pitt)